Skip to main content
Glama
rabbit385

crypto-inspector-mcp

by rabbit385
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to crypto-inspector-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • VerdictSwarm MCP Server

      sentien-labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan crypto tokens for rug pulls, scams, and risk using a six-agent consensus system. It provides real-time security audits and risk scoring for tokens on Solana, Ethereum, Base, and BSC.
      6
      2
      MIT

    • safeagent-token-safety

      Aigen-Protocol
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Token safety oracle for AI agents. Honeypot detection, 17 scam pattern checks, LP lock verification across 6 EVM chains. Score 0-100 with risk flags. ERC Token Safety Score standard.
      1
      MIT

    • agentshield-mcp

      atmflow55
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Real-time smart contract security for autonomous AI agents, offering tools for contract verification, wallet monitoring, drain detection, threat reporting, and leaderboards.
      19
      7
      MIT
    • AgentRisk MCP by Neurobyteio

      AgentRisk MCPofficial

      Neurobyteio
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Base to call a check_token_risk tool before trading, providing honeypot detection, LP-lock verification, brand impersonation checks, and live sell simulation across Uniswap V2/V3/V4 and Aerodrome with a clear risk score and should-trade decision.
      1
      -
    • SolSentry MCP by solsentry

      SolSentry MCPofficial

      solsentry
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides post-deploy Solana threat intelligence, enabling AI agents to check operators, tokens, and network stats for detecting rug pulls and malicious activity.
      5
      27
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The single inspect_token tool has a clearly defined purpose, so an agent cannot misselect it.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The only tool name follows a clear verb_noun convention (inspect_token) and accurately reflects its function. There is no set of tools to establish a broader naming pattern, but the name is well-formed and self-explanatory.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server exposes only one tool for what is described as a comprehensive security and liquidity check. This feels too thin for the as a token inspection MCP, which would typically benefit from separately callable tools for specific aspects such as liquidity details, holder analysis, or price data.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is extremely limited, offering only a single monolithic action. While the description claims a comprehensive check, there are no additional tools for focused queries, comparing tokens, or retrieving specific aspects of the analysis, leaving obvious gaps in an inspection workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources