summarize_paper

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks behavioral details such as whether the summary is synchronous, the output format, or error handling for invalid IDs. With no annotations, the description fails to disclose important traits beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, making it concise but under-specified. It lacks structure or additional context that would justify its brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has a single required parameter and no output schema, the description should provide more behavioral context and typical usage. It fails to indicate what 'structured summary' entails or how to interpret results, especially with many sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes 'arxiv_id' as 'arXiv paper ID to summarize'. The description adds no extra meaning, simply restating the parameter usage. Baseline for 100% coverage is 3, but no added value reduces the score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates a structured summary of a paper with key sections, identifying the verb 'generate' and resource 'paper'. However, it does not differentiate from siblings like 'extract_key_findings' or 'get_paper_details', which could overlap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With 27 sibling tools including 'extract_key_findings', 'get_paper_details', and 'search_papers', the agent has no context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.