smart_extract_paper

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It merely introduces three tiers but adds no detail beyond what the schema already specifies (e.g., which engine each tier uses). The adaptive mechanism is mentioned but not explained in terms of behavior, cost, or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with only 8 words, front-loading 'Advanced PDF extraction'. It is concise but overly brief, missing important usage guidance that could reasonably fit without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 100% schema coverage, the description's job is to explain overall context. It states the purpose and mentions the adaptive mechanism, but does not describe return values, success criteria, or when each tier is appropriate. For a tool with 4 parameters and many siblings, this is minimally adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add any meaning beyond the schema; it only reiterates the tier names already in the parameter enumerations.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it performs 'Advanced PDF extraction' with a 'three-tier adaptive mechanism', specifying the verb and resource. It hints at differentiation from siblings like 'download_and_read_paper' by emphasizing the adaptive tiers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of when to choose 'fast', 'smart', or 'premium', nor any reference to sibling tools that might be simpler or more specific.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.