Skip to main content
Glama
qylhjhd

MCP Security Gateway

by qylhjhd

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Security Gateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP clients to safely access upstream MCP servers through centralized policy enforcement, including allow/deny/approval decisions, schema pinning, circuit breakers, and audit logging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Governed MCP gateway that lets AI agents call tools with policy enforcement, prompt-injection screening, a kill-switch, and tamper-evident signed audit logs.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP proxy that enforces security policies, content scanning, and audit logging between AI agents and tool servers
      25
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Security-enforcing MCP proxy that sits between an AI agent and any number of downstream MCP servers, intercepting every tool call through a capability-token policy gateway that can allow, deny, or escalate to human approval before the call reaches any real tool. It also exposes built-in operator tools for approval workflows, audit trail queries, token management, voice/HUD output, and hierarchical
      21
      13
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one lists customers in a paginated manner, the other fetches a single customer's details. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the exact same verb_noun pattern: list_customers and read_customer. The naming is perfectly consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin, especially given the name 'Security Gateway' which implies a broader scope. However, the two tools cover a minimal read-only customer lookup workflow, so it is borderline but not extreme.

    Completeness3/5

    The server provides only read operations (list and get) with no create, update, or delete capabilities. For a customer-focused toolset, this is a notable gap unless the server is intentionally read-only. The mismatch between the server name and the tool domain further obscures expected completeness.