generate_dashboard_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the tool generates a URL but doesn't disclose behavioral traits such as whether this is a read-only operation, if it requires authentication, what format the URL takes, or if there are rate limits. The description is minimal and lacks essential context for safe and effective use.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose. There is no wasted language, and it directly states what the tool does with optional features mentioned concisely. It earns its place without unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 parameters, nested objects, no output schema, and no annotations), the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the return value, error conditions, or how parameters interact. For a tool that generates URLs with multiple options, more context is needed to ensure proper usage without trial and error.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'optional time range and variables', which loosely maps to 'from', 'to', and 'variables' parameters, but doesn't explain the other parameters like 'dashboardUid', 'refresh', or 'panelId'. The description adds minimal meaning beyond the schema, failing to adequately document the 6 parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'generate' and the resource 'URL for a specific dashboard', making the purpose understandable. It distinguishes from siblings like 'generate_panel_url' and 'generate_explore_url' by specifying it's for dashboards, though it doesn't explicitly contrast with them. The description is specific but lacks explicit sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'generate_panel_url' or 'generate_explore_url'. It mentions 'optional time range and variables' but doesn't explain when these should be used or what scenarios warrant this tool over others. No explicit when/when-not instructions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.