Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
BQ_PROJECTNoBigQuery project
BQ_LOCATIONNoBigQuery location
DBT_TARGET_DIRYesdbt target/ directory (required)
DBT_DUCKDB_PATHNoDuckDB warehouse file

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
run_summaryA

Summarise the most recent dbt run: how many tests failed, and their names.

Use this first to judge overall health before drilling into any one failure.
list_failing_testsA

List every failing test in the last dbt run, with what it guards.

Returns the test name, the model and column it protects, how many rows failed,
and whether it is a generic (not_null, unique...) or hand-written test.
sample_failing_rowsA

Fetch the actual rows that caused a test to fail.

Args:
    test_name: the test's name or unique_id, as returned by list_failing_tests.
    limit: maximum rows to return (kept small on purpose).
healthA

Check that the server is configured correctly and can reach its inputs.

Verifies the target directory, the required artifacts, and warehouse connectivity.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: run_summary provides a high-level overview, list_failing_tests enumerates failures in detail, sample_failing_rows retrieves offending rows, and health checks configuration. Even though run_summary and list_failing_tests both relate to failing tests, they operate at different levels of detail, leaving no ambiguity.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (run_summary, list_failing_tests, sample_failing_rows). However, 'health' breaks the pattern as a single noun rather than a verb_noun construct, a minor but noticeable deviation.

Tool Count5/5

With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of analyzing dbt test failures. Each tool earns its place, and the count is appropriate for a focused domain without feeling thin or bloated.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the full workflow: verifying setup (health), getting a summary (run_summary), drilling into failures (list_failing_tests), and examining specific rows (sample_failing_rows). No obvious missing operations within the stated scope.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues