dbt-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dbt-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes dbt project artifacts and data quality result tables (BigQuery/Postgres) to LLM clients, enabling deep introspection, run-history analysis, source freshness, test coverage, and lineage walks.2728 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server that provides comprehensive dbt project quality assessment for any GitHub repository, enabling AI agents to analyze dbt models, check metadata coverage, and map data lineage.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAI-driven MCP server that audits, profiles, detects schema drift, and auto-generates documentation for dbt projects, enabling natural language interaction with your dbt project's health.124MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools to interact with dbt, including dbt Core, Cloud CLI, Semantic Layer, and Discovery API.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that wraps the dbt CLI tool, enabling AI coding agents to interact with dbt projects through standardized MCP tools. Developed by Mammoth Growth.918MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing read-only Snowflake metadata tools (schemas, tables, queries, lineage) for agentic data pipeline generation, enabling natural-language-to-pipeline workflows with dbt, Airflow, and Great Expectations.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: run_summary provides a high-level overview, list_failing_tests enumerates failures in detail, sample_failing_rows retrieves offending rows, and health checks configuration. Even though run_summary and list_failing_tests both relate to failing tests, they operate at different levels of detail, leaving no ambiguity.
Most tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (run_summary, list_failing_tests, sample_failing_rows). However, 'health' breaks the pattern as a single noun rather than a verb_noun construct, a minor but noticeable deviation.
With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of analyzing dbt test failures. Each tool earns its place, and the count is appropriate for a focused domain without feeling thin or bloated.
The tool set covers the full workflow: verifying setup (health), getting a summary (run_summary), drilling into failures (list_failing_tests), and examining specific rows (sample_failing_rows). No obvious missing operations within the stated scope.