Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dbt-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes dbt project artifacts and data quality result tables (BigQuery/Postgres) to LLM clients, enabling deep introspection, run-history analysis, source freshness, test coverage, and lineage walks.
      27
      28 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that provides comprehensive dbt project quality assessment for any GitHub repository, enabling AI agents to analyze dbt models, check metadata coverage, and map data lineage.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-driven MCP server that audits, profiles, detects schema drift, and auto-generates documentation for dbt projects, enabling natural language interaction with your dbt project's health.
      124
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools to interact with dbt, including dbt Core, Cloud CLI, Semantic Layer, and Discovery API.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing read-only Snowflake metadata tools (schemas, tables, queries, lineage) for agentic data pipeline generation, enabling natural-language-to-pipeline workflows with dbt, Airflow, and Great Expectations.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: run_summary provides a high-level overview, list_failing_tests enumerates failures in detail, sample_failing_rows retrieves offending rows, and health checks configuration. Even though run_summary and list_failing_tests both relate to failing tests, they operate at different levels of detail, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (run_summary, list_failing_tests, sample_failing_rows). However, 'health' breaks the pattern as a single noun rather than a verb_noun construct, a minor but noticeable deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of analyzing dbt test failures. Each tool earns its place, and the count is appropriate for a focused domain without feeling thin or bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full workflow: verifying setup (health), getting a summary (run_summary), drilling into failures (list_failing_tests), and examining specific rows (sample_failing_rows). No obvious missing operations within the stated scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues