cn-holiday-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| query_holidayA | 查询某一天(YYYY-MM-DD)是法定节假日、调休上班日还是普通工作日。返回节假日名称、放假区间和该区间内的调休上班日。 |
| list_holidaysA | 列出某一年(或全部已收录年份)的法定节假日安排,包括放假区间、天数与调休上班日。 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
query_holiday targets a single specific date while list_holidays returns full annual arrangements, so their purposes are clearly distinct. There is no practical overlap that would cause an agent to misselect.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: query_holiday and list_holidays. The only minor difference is singular versus plural noun, which is natural and does not harm consistency.
Two tools is slightly thin, but each tool earns its place for the server's narrow read-only purpose. It falls at the borderline edge of the typical 3-15 tool range.
The server covers the core holiday use cases: checking a specific day and listing a year's holiday schedule. Minor gaps exist, such as date-range lookups or upcoming-holiday queries, but they are workable conveniences rather than critical dead ends.