search_fireworks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It correctly implies a read-only catalog search, but it does not mention pagination, result format, or limits, and it claims search by 'operating time' (времени работы), which is not represented anywhere in the input schema. This is a misleading behavioral claim.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler. It states the tool's purpose and main filtering dimensions efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 9-parameter search tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It omits text querying, category_id, pagination parameters, default behavior, and result characteristics, while also claiming an unsupported time-based filter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds useful semantic grouping by mapping budget to price parameters, caliber to the caliber parameter, and volleys to shot counts, but it adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema and introduces an unsupported 'operating time' criterion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: searching for pyrotechnics and fireworks in the pyro.ua catalog. It also names concrete filtering dimensions (budget, caliber, volleys), which makes it easy to distinguish from sibling tools like get_firework_details or check_stock_availability.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_firework_details or check_stock_availability. The search intent is implied by the name and description, but no when-to-use/when-not-to-use conditions or sibling comparisons are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.