create_order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions an instant payment link but does not explain that a payment may be initiated, potential side effects (e.g., charges, order creation), idempotency usage, or confirmation steps. Critical behavioral context is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, very concise and front-loaded with the core purpose. However, it is under-specified, omitting critical usage and behavioral details, so the brevity comes at the cost of effectiveness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 14 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is far too minimal. It does not explain the required workflow (e.g., needing delivery refs), idempotency, legal age confirmation, or what the response contains. This is highly incomplete for a complex order creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100% for all 14 parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so it stays at baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (Оформление) and resource (заказ в pyro.ua), and mentions the two payment methods (Monobank card link and cash on delivery). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like search_fireworks or track_order, which handle other parts of the order lifecycle.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor on prerequisites like needing delivery references from search_delivery_branches. The description implies it's for order creation but does not specify conditions, exclusions, or required prior steps.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.