Skip to main content
Glama
pvliesdonk

markdown-vault-mcp

by pvliesdonk

Orphan Notes

get_orphan_notes
Read-onlyIdempotent

Find isolated notes with no inbound or outbound links to identify vault content that needs connecting or removal. Use when orphan count exceeds zero to clean up disconnected markdown files.

Instructions

Return all notes with no inbound or outbound links.

WARNING: returns ALL orphans with no limit — check 'stats' for orphan_count before calling on large vaults.

An orphan note has no backlinks (no other note links to it) and no outlinks (it links to nothing). Call this when 'stats' shows orphan_count > 0. Useful for finding isolated notes that may need to be connected to the rest of the vault or removed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
wait_for_pending_writesNoWait for recent index writes. On timeout, answer from the current index with _meta.index_stale=true. Default false.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv5.0.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / wait_for_pending_writes / description
      Previous value: -"When True, wait until your recent\ndocument mutations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a document mutation whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."New value: +"Wait for recent index writes. On timeout, answer from the current index with _meta.index_stale=true. Default false."
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv4.0.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / wait_for_pending_writes / description
      Previous value: -"When True, wait until your recent\nwrite/edit/delete/rename operations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a write/edit/delete/rename whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."New value: +"When True, wait until your recent\ndocument mutations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a document mutation whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."
  3. First observedv3.1.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark it read-only and idempotent, but the description adds important behavioral context: 'returns ALL orphans with no limit' and the warning to check orphan_count on large vaults. This goes beyond the structured annotations and helps agents avoid expensive calls.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and well-structured: main action first, then a warning, then a definition and usage trigger. Every sentence serves a purpose, and the most important operational caveat is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with one optional parameter and an output schema, the description covers what it returns, when to call it, how to identify orphans, and a performance warning. Nothing needed for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter wait_for_pending_writes is fully documented in the schema with 100% coverage, so the description does not need to repeat it. It adds no parameter-specific detail, but the schema carries the load; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Return all notes with no inbound or outbound links.' It then defines what an orphan note is in concrete terms, making the tool's scope unambiguous and distinct from link-focused siblings like get_backlinks or get_outlinks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit trigger condition: 'Call this when stats shows orphan_count > 0.' It also warns to check stats before use on large vaults. It does not mention when not to use it or name alternative tools, but the usage context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.