Skip to main content
Glama
markdown-vault-mcp

markdown-vault-mcp

by pvliesdonk

Most-Linked Notes

get_most_linked
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists notes ordered by backlink count to identify frequently referenced vault entries; use get_backlinks to see which notes link to a result.

Instructions

List the notes with the most backlinks, most first.

Use get_backlinks for the notes that link to one of them.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum notes to return (default 10).
wait_for_pending_writesNoWait for recent index writes. On timeout, answer from the current index with _meta.index_stale=true. Default false.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv6.1.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Maximum number of results to return. Default 10."New value: +"Maximum notes to return (default 10)."
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv5.0.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / wait_for_pending_writes / description
      Previous value: -"When True, wait until your recent\ndocument mutations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a document mutation whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."New value: +"Wait for recent index writes. On timeout, answer from the current index with _meta.index_stale=true. Default false."
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv4.0.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / wait_for_pending_writes / description
      Previous value: -"When True, wait until your recent\nwrite/edit/delete/rename operations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a write/edit/delete/rename whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."New value: +"When True, wait until your recent\ndocument mutations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a document mutation whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."
  4. First observedv3.1.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds the ordering guarantee, which is genuine behavior beyond annotations, but says nothing about result shape limits, whether backlink counts are included, or index freshness beyond what the schema already documents.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero filler, with the core purpose front-loaded and the sibling routing as the follow-up. Nothing could be removed without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, and both params are fully documented. Purpose, ordering and sibling routing are all present; only minor context such as what a 'backlink' counts as is left implicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: limit and wait_for_pending_writes are both documented in the schema, including timeout fallback behavior. The description adds no parameter meaning on top of that, which hits the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List the notes with the most backlinks') plus the sort order ('most first'), so the agent knows exactly what comes back. It also names a sibling it is not, distinguishing itself from the per-note link tools without requiring the schema to be opened.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit routing to get_backlinks for the complementary question ('the notes that link to one of them'). It doesn't state an explicit trigger sentence like 'use this to find hub notes', so usage is partly implied, but the alternative-selection guidance is real and actionable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.