Skip to main content
Glama
pvliesdonk

markdown-vault-mcp

by pvliesdonk

Most-Linked Notes

get_most_linked
Read-onlyIdempotent

Identify key concepts in a Markdown vault by retrieving documents ranked by inbound link count. Use this to discover hub notes that are frequently referenced by other notes.

Instructions

Return the documents with the most inbound links, ranked by backlink count.

Useful for discovering hub notes — frequently-referenced notes that are likely key concepts in the vault. For the specific documents that link to a particular note, use 'get_backlinks' instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum number of results to return. Default 10.
wait_for_pending_writesNoWhen True, wait until your recent document mutations have been applied to the index before answering, so the results reflect those changes. Use it right after modifying notes when this read must see them (e.g. right after a document mutation whose effect this read should reflect). Default False answers immediately from the current index — almost always already up to date; inspect the response's ``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still in flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on timeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting longer.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv4.0.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / wait_for_pending_writes / description
      Previous value: -"When True, wait until your recent\nwrite/edit/delete/rename operations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a write/edit/delete/rename whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."New value: +"When True, wait until your recent\ndocument mutations have been applied to the\nindex before answering, so the results reflect those changes.\nUse it right after modifying notes when this read must see\nthem (e.g. right after a document mutation whose\neffect this read should reflect). Default\nFalse answers immediately from the current index — almost\nalways already up to date; inspect the response's\n``_meta.index_stale`` field to tell whether a write was still\nin flight. Bounded by a server timeout (default 60s); on\ntimeout it answers from the current index rather than waiting\nlonger."
  2. First observedv3.1.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the ranking-by-backlink-count behavior but does not add further behavioral context such as tie-breaking, self-link handling, or index freshness; the latter is addressed in the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loads the primary behavior, includes a concrete use case, and ends with a clear pointer to an alternative. No sentence is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a simple read-only query, annotations cover safety, the schema covers all parameters, an output schema exists, and the description adds use-case and sibling context. Nothing important is missing for correct selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents both limit and wait_for_pending_writes. The description does not need to add parameter details, and the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the operation: return the documents with the most inbound links ranked by backlink count. It also explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling tool get_backlinks, making the tool's unique role easy to identify.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use this tool ('discovering hub notes') and explicitly points to get_backlinks for the alternative case of finding documents that link to a particular note. This gives an agent actionable routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pvliesdonk/markdown-vault-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server