browser_press_key

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of explaining behavior. It states that it presses a key and supports modifier keys, which is useful, but it does not disclose that the press targets the currently focused element, whether full keyboard events are dispatched, or what happens with invalid keys.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no fluff. The action and examples are front-loaded, followed by use cases and modifier support, so every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple keyboard tool with full schema coverage, the description is mostly adequate, covering key examples and modifier keys. However, with no annotations and no output schema, it omits important invocation context such as the need to have the right element focused and what the tool returns or does on failure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters clearly. The description only repeats modifier support already visible in the schema and adds no deeper parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and object: 'Press a keyboard key', then lists concrete examples and use cases. This clearly distinguishes it from the many mouse-based sibling tools like browser_click, browser_hover, and browser_double_click.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context for when to use it: submitting forms, navigating dropdowns, and closing dialogs. It does not explicitly state when not to use it or name alternative tools, but the use cases are enough to guide an agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.