Skip to main content
Glama
pssrh
by pssrh

Related Servers

Alternatives to pony-browser-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables remote AI agents to control a local, authenticated desktop browser over MCP through an outbound WebSocket bridge and Chrome extension, supporting tab management, navigation, page reading, clicking, typing, scrolling, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-driven browser automation from any MCP client by pairing with a Chrome extension, translating tool calls into WebSocket commands to drive Chrome without an Electron host.
      1,840 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects ChatGPT Web to a local development environment, enabling file reads and patches, shell execution, plan updates, and isolated worktree coordination through permissioned MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects ChatGPT and MCP clients to authorized local development environments, enabling secure file access, shell execution, persistent tasks, browser/desktop control, and remote management of projects.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control and inspect the user's actual Chrome browser via MCP, preserving login sessions and isolating agent tasks in background tab groups without disrupting the user's workflow.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets any MCP agent control your signed-in Chrome with full login state, offering normal browser tools and an optional Fast JEV mode for bounded-speed typed decisions on the same profile.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 45 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions or resource types, and the descriptions heavily cross-reference when to prefer one alternative over another (e.g., browser_set_date vs browser_fill, browser_drop_file vs browser_upload_file). The main ambiguity risk comes from the cluster of click variants and form-input tools, but the descriptions do enough to disambiguate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The browser_ prefix and snake_case style are consistent, and most names follow a verb_noun pattern. A few exceptions like browser_screenshot, browser_console_logs, browser_clipboard_stats, and browser_about deviate from the verb-first convention, creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    45 tools is well above the 25+ threshold for 'too many' and will create real selection overhead for agents. While browser automation is a broad domain, the surface could likely be consolidated or split into focused servers.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset is remarkably comprehensive, covering navigation, interaction, forms, files, dialogs, tabs/windows, frames, network, storage, clipboard, and user-in-the-loop flows. Minor gaps exist—such as explicit back/forward/reload navigation and delete-cookie/clear-storage operations—but most workflows can still be completed through workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues