Skip to main content
Glama
proofjson

mcp-proofjson

by proofjson

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-proofjson

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for German e-invoice compliance (XRechnung 3.0 & ZUGFeRD 2.x) enabling AI agents to validate, generate, parse, and check compliance of electronic invoices per EN 16931.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server to validate Brazilian fiscal documents (NF-e and NFS-e) locally before transmission, offering actionable feedback without requiring certificates or sending data anywhere.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for electronic invoicing that enables generating, validating, and parsing Factur-X and ZUGFeRD compliant XML invoices. It supports the French 2026 B2B reform and provides integration with Chorus Pro for automated invoice submission and status tracking.
      9
      25 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for e-invoice platforms. Enables natural language querying of invoices, partners, company data, and financial reports.
      18
      3 npm
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A fully local, closed-world MCP server that manages, validates, and serves bank-specific ISO 20022 clearing profiles and rule packs, enabling AI agents to discover profiles, fetch them, lint payloads against them, and validate rule-pack definitions.
      4
      35 PyPI
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: assessing invoice risk, listing verification packs, and verifying proofs. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (assess_invoice, list_proofjson_packs, verify_proofjson_proof).

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is slightly low but appropriate for the narrow scope of invoice risk assessment with ProofJSON v1. The set feels minimal but not insufficient.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover assessment, listing capabilities, and verification, but lack configuration, invoice management, or external verification tools. Gaps exist for a full workflow, but acceptable for a v1 limitation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues