Skip to main content
Glama
privacyplaybook

sops-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to sops-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for end-to-end encrypted secret storage and retrieval, enabling LLM agents to fetch secrets by name via one-time URLs while keeping plaintext out of model context and logs.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to use secrets (API keys, tokens) via encrypted vault, executing HTTP/shell/SSH actions server-side while never exposing secret values to the AI.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for DemiPass secrets management, enabling AI agents to securely store, rotate, and use credentials without exposing them in context windows.
      31 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI agents call APIs without ever seeing the credentials, using a local encrypted vault and per-secret allowlist policies for HTTP requests and subprocess environment variables.
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Encrypted secrets management MCP server for AI agents, enabling secure storage, retrieval, rotation, and auditing of API keys and credentials with AES-128 encryption.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Secrets management MCP server that injects credentials into API requests for AI agents, enforcing policies and logging all activity without exposing raw keys.
      31 npm
      30
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: create/add/delete/rename/rotate/update/rekey target different lifecycle operations, and descriptions explicitly define boundaries. The main overlap is the convenience tools sops_create_oidc_secret and sops_create_k8s_secret versus generic sops_create_secrets, though their specialized outputs make the distinction workable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the same sops_ prefix, snake_case, and action-oriented naming, generally verb_noun (create_secrets, list_domains, delete_secrets). The few shorter names like sops_rekey are still predictable and consistent with the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the server stays within a well-scoped range for a SOPS secrets manager. Each tool corresponds to a meaningful operation, and even the convenience tools earn their place by producing specialized outputs.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main SOPS lifecycle: create, list, add, delete, rename, rotate, update external values, rekey, metadata, and Kubernetes/OIDC specializations. Minor gaps remain, such as no direct tool for retrieving/decrypting an existing secret value or updating/removing existing metadata.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow