Skip to main content
Glama
printplan3d

ritn3d-mcp

by printplan3d

Related Servers

Alternatives to ritn3d-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, edit, validate, and read back production-grade CAD drawings — including P&ID sheets, mechanical parts and assemblies, and architectural floor plans with measured areas and schedules — through a single typed tool contract that runs either live via COM on Windows or headlessly via ezdxf anywhere. It also supports standards-aware dimensioning, ISO GD&T and tolerance checks, takeoff workbooks, and drawing understanding, diffing, and critique.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multifamily renovation cost estimation, scope of work generation, contractor bid evaluation, ROI gating, and risk flagging for real estate intelligence agents.
      11
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with CAD software through semantic spatial topology and architectural ontology, supporting drawing, block/layer/entity management, and safe preview-apply transaction workflows for AutoCAD, ZWCAD, GstarCAD, and BricsCAD.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to author, read, critique, and validate production CAD drawings through 247 typed tools spanning mechanical parts, architectural plans, P&IDs, takeoffs, and ISO GD&T / dimension-tolerance checks. It drives live AutoCAD over COM on Windows or runs headlessly anywhere via ezdxf, with pack and discovery modes to keep the advertised tool surface cheap.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to interact with Autodesk Revit for building design, editing, analysis, clash detection, MEP, interop, documentation, and model persistence via 48 tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one validates the image format, one estimates complexity, and one estimates render time. There is no functional overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (validate_, estimate_). The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 3 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose as a pre-processing helper. The count is appropriate and not excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover essential pre-flight checks and estimations. The missing actual rendering submission is likely handled externally, so no critical gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues