plur_packs_install

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (idempotentHint, destructiveHint) are minimal. The description adds valuable behavioral details: mandatory security scan that blocks on secrets, conflict detection, and metadata recording. No contradictions found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. First sentence states the core action; second adds critical context (security scan, conflict detection, metadata, and reference to preview tool).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter install tool with no output schema, the description covers key behaviors (security, conflicts, metadata). Missing return value info or error scenarios, but adequate for the scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'source'. The description repeats 'directory path' but adds no new semantic info beyond the schema's parameter description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool installs an engram pack from a directory path, with specific actions like security scans and conflict detection. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like plur_packs_preview and plur_packs_uninstall.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly advises calling plur_packs_preview first, providing clear usage guidance. It doesn't specify when not to use the tool, but the mention of the prerequisite is strong.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.