plur_capture

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations give destructiveHint=false and idempotentHint=false. The description adds 'append' and 'records' which imply non-destructive, additive behavior. However, it does not disclose details like whether episodes are immutable or what happens on repeated calls with same summary, leaving some uncertainty.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that immediately states the action. Every word is meaningful with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a simple append operation but lacks context about return values, error conditions, or further behavioral details. Given no output schema, more elaboration would help completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters have schema descriptions (100% coverage), meeting the baseline. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema explanations, so it does not elevate the score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'append' and resource 'episode to the episodic timeline', clearly stating its action. It distinguishes itself from siblings like 'plur_timeline' and 'plur_episode_to_engram' by focusing on recording a session event.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among many siblings, the description does not mention exclusions or contexts where other tools would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.