Get Themes
getThemesRetrieve all themes for a PingOne AIC realm to view authentication customization options.
Instructions
Retrieve all themes for a specific realm in PingOne AIC
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| realm | Yes | Realm name |
getThemesRetrieve all themes for a PingOne AIC realm to view authentication customization options.
Retrieve all themes for a specific realm in PingOne AIC
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| realm | Yes | Realm name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds no further behavioral traits (e.g., pagination, ordering), but does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words. It efficiently communicates the tool's purpose and scope.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and annotations present, the description is sufficient. It could optionally mention that the return value is an array of themes, but this is not essential given the tool's name.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter (realm) with description 'Realm name' and enums. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, and schema coverage is 100%, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'retrieve', the resource 'themes', and the context 'PingOne AIC'. It also specifies the scope 'for a specific realm', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'getTheme' (single theme) and 'createTheme'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that 'getTheme' should be used for a specific theme by ID, or any prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server