Delete Environment Variable (ESV)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description 'Delete an environment variable' is consistent with the destructiveHint annotation, but it adds no additional behavioral details beyond what annotations already convey. No mention of permanence, authorization requirements, or irreversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary information. It is appropriately sized for a simple delete operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a straightforward delete tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description is sufficiently complete. It conveys the essential purpose and resource scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully describes the single parameter variableId with format hint. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and description clearly state 'Delete an environment variable (ESV)' from PingOne AIC, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like setVariable, getVariable, and queryESVs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for deletion but does not explicitly state when to use it vs alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or side effects. The destructiveHint annotation provides some guidance but the description itself lacks explicit usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.