Skip to main content
Glama
pickstar-2002

Video Metadata MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Video Metadata MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive video file analysis including extracting metadata, stream information, bitrate calculations, and generating technical reports. Supports all FFmpeg-compatible video formats with output in JSON, text, or Markdown formats.
      4
      9 npm
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Manages sports video metadata with CRUD operations for game information, teams, scores, and statistics. Enables advanced search filtering by game type, teams, league, season, and date ranges through PostgreSQL integration.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Web-based video editing platform that provides direct editing functionality through a Model Context Protocol server, supporting media file management, timeline editing, and advanced transformation effects.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive file operations including reading, writing, searching, and editing files with advanced features like regex-based replacements, line-specific modifications, and directory-wide search capabilities. Provides 8 robust tools for safe file manipulation with content verification and detailed error handling.
      8
      23 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between add_video_tags/remove_video_tags and their batch counterparts, which could cause confusion about when to use which. The core operations (read, update, search) are clearly separated, and the batch operations are logically grouped, but the single vs. batch distinction might not always be obvious to an agent without careful reading of descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structure (e.g., add_video_tags, read_video_metadata). The naming is predictable and readable, with batch operations prefixed appropriately, making it easy to understand the tool's function at a glance.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, this server is well-scoped for video metadata management. It covers essential operations (read, update, search) and includes both single and batch variants for common tasks, which is reasonable and efficient for the domain without being overwhelming or too sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers key CRUD-like operations for video metadata (read, update, search, tag management), with good support for batch processing. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for deleting video files or metadata entirely, which might be needed in some workflows, but the existing tools handle most common use cases effectively.