Skip to main content
Glama
phoenice-labs

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets coding agents test AI agents. Create YAML test cases, snapshot golden baselines, check for regressions, and generate visual reports all from inside Claude Code or any MCP-compatible tool. Works with LangGraph, CrewAI, OpenAI, Claude, Mistral, and any HTTP API.
      10
      34 npm
      241 PyPI
      135
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Industrial-grade defensive unit test synthesis and code auditing MCP server for Cursor and Claude Desktop. Synthesizes parameterized boundary test suites and AST defensive checks with zero dependencies.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP and coding-agent reliability harness that captures bounded, sanitized failure evidence and generates deterministic executable regression tests. Capture is opt-in; no API key or hosted service is required.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Wraps existing test frameworks (Jest, Vitest, Pytest) and exposes structured, LLM-optimized results via MCP tools with progressive disclosure and diff-aware execution.
      11
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local-first task contract generation and drift/sludge guard checks for coding tasks, with CLI and VS Code extension support.
      38 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but analyze_coverage and feedback_status both address coverage gaps, causing slight ambiguity. Overall, the majority are clearly distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Nearly all tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., generate_tests, run_mutation_tests). Only health deviates slightly but is still clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools, the surface covers all necessary operations for a test framework server without being excessive. Each tool serves a well-defined role.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the entire workflow from test generation, validation, registry, execution, mutation testing, reporting, and import. No obvious gaps for the intended domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues