plane-work-item-delete
Deletes a specific work item from a Plane project using its project and issue UUIDs.
Instructions
Delete a work item.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| issue_id | Yes | Issue UUID | |
| project_id | Yes | Project UUID |
Deletes a specific work item from a Plane project using its project and issue UUIDs.
Delete a work item.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| issue_id | Yes | Issue UUID | |
| project_id | Yes | Project UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only states 'Delete', implying a destructive action, but does not disclose permanence, permission requirements, or side effects. A more detailed description would improve transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. It is perfectly concise for a simple delete operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description provides the core action, and the schema covers parameters. However, it lacks context about deletion consequences, error handling, or confirmation, which would be helpful for an agent. This is adequate but not complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters described as 'Issue UUID' and 'Project UUID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a work item' clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (work item). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like plane-work-item-create, plane-work-item-update, etc., by specifying the delete operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other work item operations). The description does not mention prerequisites or context for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/philipvanlewis/plane-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server