list_services

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a non-destructive read operation ('list'). Although annotations are missing, the wording itself implies safety, and there is no contradiction with the absence of destructive hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It directly states the operation and resource, making it highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless read-only listing tool, the description provides all necessary context. The user knows exactly what the tool does and what to expect: a list of all services.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters in its schema. The description does not need to explain any parameters, as there are none, and the schema coverage is complete by default.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (list) and the resource (all services) from the Clockodo API. It is unambiguous and leaves no doubt about the tool's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description is self-explanatory for a simple read-only listing operation. It does not explicitly mention when to use it over sibling tools, but the absence of parameters and the generic 'list all' phrasing makes the use case obvious in context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.