health

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose side effects or return format. It merely says 'health check' without specifying whether it is read-only or what output to expect. Given no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral transparency, and it falls short of explicit detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the essential purpose without any extraneous detail. It is optimally sized for its simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is minimal, and the description covers its basic function completely. However, it does not mention what the health check returns (e.g., status, error codes), which could be relevant for an agent deciding whether to invoke it. Still, for a health check, the purpose is clear enough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is nothing to describe. The absence of parameters is accurately reflected in the input schema, and no additional explanation is necessary.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is unambiguous: it states that the tool performs a health check for the Clockodo MCP server. There is no ambiguity about the tool's primary function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While no explicit when-to-use guidance is given, the purpose is self-evident. A health check is typically invoked to verify server status, and the description implies this usage without needing further clarification.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.