Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to gr4-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language control of a live GNU Radio SDR flowgraph, allowing users to tune frequencies, adjust gain, capture IQ samples, analyze spectra, and detect signals through an MCP-compatible client.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to operate a Fishball7020/PlutoSky software-defined radio, including tuning, spectrum analysis, band scanning, IQ capture, FPGA filtering, and optional transmission.
      16
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables natural language-driven creation and management of GNU Radio flowgraphs with validated block connections and parameter configurations. It provides tools for searching the GNU Radio block library, detecting SDR hardware, and generating functional signal processing code.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables control of Software Defined Radios and decoding of radio protocols through an AI-friendly Model Context Protocol interface, supporting RTL-SDR and HackRF hardware for signal analysis and protocol decoding.
      19 PyPI
      30
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to the Node-RED Admin API, enabling flow inspection, node management, graph analysis, debug capture, and rollback operations through natural language.
      37
      20 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have a clearly distinct target: catalog browsing (search_blocks, describe_block, list_categories), graph editing (add_block, connect, set_parameters), and runtime control (deploy_graph, control_session, read_stream). The one risky pair is set_parameters vs update_block_settings and get_block_settings vs show_graph, but their descriptions explicitly contrast graph-edit vs live-session semantics. Only minor boundary friction remains.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is snake_case verb_noun (list_categories, add_block, remove_block, save_graph, deploy_graph, read_stream). Deviations are minor and readable: noun-first status tools (backend_status, session_status) and a few verbless/bare-verb names (new_graph, connect, disconnect). No casing mixing.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is on the heavy side, but the domain genuinely spans four sub-areas (block catalog, graph editing, deployment/sessions, backend install management) and each tool covers a real operation. Nothing looks redundant enough to remove, though a couple of status tools could conceivably be merged.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle is well covered end to end: discover blocks, build/edit a graph, validate, save/load, deploy, control the session, and read live data, plus backend install and attach management. Small gaps exist around exposing graph export/serialization details or bulk session cleanup, but agents can work around them with existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues