Semantic API
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEMANTIC_API_KEY | Yes | Your Semantic API key | |
| SEMANTIC_API_URL | No | API base URL override | https://semanticapi.dev |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| semantic_queryA | Search for an API capability using natural language. |
| semantic_discoverC | Deep discovery of a specific provider/API by name and intent. |
| semantic_discover_urlB | Analyze any API from its documentation URL. Generates a full provider config. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: semantic_discover targets APIs by provider name, semantic_discover_url analyzes documentation URLs, and semantic_query searches via natural language. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent 'semantic_' prefix pattern with descriptive suffixes (discover, discover_url, query). This uniformity enhances readability and predictability, adhering to a clear naming convention throughout.
With 3 tools, the count is slightly low but reasonable for the server's purpose of API discovery and querying. It covers key operations (discovery by name, URL, and natural language), though additional tools for managing or testing discovered APIs could enhance completeness.
The tools provide good coverage for discovering and querying APIs, but there are notable gaps in lifecycle management. For example, there are no tools for saving, updating, or deleting discovered API configurations, which could limit agent workflows in a full API integration scenario.