A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server for searching and discovering 4,000+ public APIs
3
MIT
Semantic API
Related Servers
Alternatives to Semantic API
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for API discovery and execution with a token-efficient search -> execute workflow over OpenAPI, Google Discovery, and optional native GraphQL and gRPC sources.29 npm12Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying Swagger/OpenAPI metadata efficiently from AI tools, enabling fast API discovery, search, and schema inspection.335 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAggregates multiple OpenAPI specifications into a single searchable MCP server, enabling AI agents to query API endpoints across all services using natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to explore, search, and query API definitions from OpenAPI/Swagger JSON files.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for API discovery from .mind spec files, enabling AI assistants to list, inspect, and call APIs defined in OpenAPI specs.49 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: semantic_discover targets APIs by provider name, semantic_discover_url analyzes documentation URLs, and semantic_query searches via natural language. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent 'semantic_' prefix pattern with descriptive suffixes (discover, discover_url, query). This uniformity enhances readability and predictability, adhering to a clear naming convention throughout.
Tool Count4/5
With 3 tools, the count is slightly low but reasonable for the server's purpose of API discovery and querying. It covers key operations (discovery by name, URL, and natural language), though additional tools for managing or testing discovered APIs could enhance completeness.
Completeness3/5
The tools provide good coverage for discovering and querying APIs, but there are notable gaps in lifecycle management. For example, there are no tools for saving, updating, or deleting discovered API configurations, which could limit agent workflows in a full API integration scenario.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues