Generate voiceover script

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-readonly, non-destructive, and open-world behavior. The description adds that GPT-4o vision reads images and that the script reflects actual content, but does not disclose additional traits like token limits, script length constraints, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with front-loaded purpose. Every sentence adds value: defines the tool, explains the AI capability, and provides a workflow hint. No extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains input (photos and optional facts), process (GPT-4o vision), and output (script text) along with the next step. For a simple tool with no required parameters and no output schema, it covers the essential aspects, though missing error handling or limitations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 67% schema coverage, the description adds value by clarifying that images are read by vision AI and that propertyCharacteristics are 'optional facts'. It also provides a default for language. The propertyCharacteristics parameter's purpose is hinted but could be more explicit.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'write' and the resource 'short voiceover script', and specifies that it uses property photos and optional facts. It distinguishes from sibling 'pedra_generate_voice' by noting the script output is passed to that tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies a workflow by instructing to pass the result to pedra_generate_voice, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. However, the context is clear enough for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.