Skip to main content
Glama
pedra-ai

Pedra MCP Server

Official
by pedra-ai

Create property video

pedra_create_video

Create a property video from a list of images, with optional music, voiceover, subtitles, and branding. Returns the finished video URL once server-side rendering completes.

Instructions

Create a property video from a list of images. Blocks server-side until the video is rendered (up to ~10 min) and returns the finished video URL inline.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
musicNo
voiceNo
imagesYesOrdered list of images that make up the video.
brandingNo
isVerticalNoForce a vertical (9:16) video.
endingTitleNo
endingSubtitleNo
propertyCharacteristicsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.5.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / images / items / properties / imageUrl / description
      Previous value: -"Source image: a public https:// URL, a data: URI, or an absolute path to a local image file (the file is read and inlined automatically)."New value: +"Source image: a public https:// URL, a data: URI, or an absolute path to a local image file on this computer (the file is read and inlined automatically). If the photo is on the user's device and can't be read from here (e.g. it's on their phone), get a link from pedra_create_upload_link."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / music / properties / track / description
      Added value: +"Genre key from pedra_music_library (e.g. acoustic, chill, cinematic, electronic, upbeat)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / voice / properties / audioId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Id of a voiceover from pedra_generate_voice. Drives the narration and its synced subtitles.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / voice / properties / audioUrl / description
      Added value: +"Legacy alias for audioId."
    • addedInput schema / properties / voice / properties / showSubtitles
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Burn in word-synced subtitles. Defaults to true.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv0.1.2
    • changedInput schema / properties / images / items / properties / imageUrl / description
      Previous value: -"URL (or data: URL) of the source image."New value: +"Source image: a public https:// URL, a data: URI, or an absolute path to a local image file (the file is read and inlined automatically)."
  4. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare a non-read-only, open-world, non-destructive write, and the description adds genuine behavioral context beyond them: the call blocks server-side for up to ~10 minutes and returns the rendered URL inline rather than requiring a polling step. That latency and return-shape disclosure is exactly what an agent needs to avoid a timeout surprise. It stops short of 5 because no auth, quota, or failure behavior is mentioned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, fully front-loaded: the action first, then the operational caveat. Nothing is padded and every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a heavy composite tool with 8 parameters, nested objects, and no output schema, the description covers the crucial return value and blocking behavior well. But it leaves the multi-input composition story (music library, voiceover dependency, branding, aspect ratio) entirely to a low-coverage schema, so the definition is adequate rather than complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25% across 8 parameters, so the description carries a heavier burden — yet it only restates 'a list of images' and says nothing about music, voice, branding, ending titles, or property characteristics. Nested structures like music.track and voice.audioId carry their own schema text, but the top-level composition options are undocumented in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Create a property video from a list of images.' It is immediately clear what the tool produces and its input source. It does not, however, differentiate itself from the sibling pedra_update_video, which an agent would need to distinguish creation from modification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and names no alternatives, even though the sibling list contains pedra_update_video, pedra_generate_voice, and pedra_music_library which are all relevant to composing a video. The only routing hint ('get a link from pedra_create_upload_link') lives in the schema, not the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.