Skip to main content
Glama
peaceful-wanderer

LSP MCP Server for Rell

Related Servers

Alternatives to LSP MCP Server for Rell

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A single MCP server that bridges to any LSP, enabling code intelligence features like hover, go-to-definition, references, and diagnostics for multiple languages via configurable language servers.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP stdio server that wraps language servers to expose read-oriented code-intelligence tools (hover, definition, references, diagnostics, etc.) for coding agents, supporting TypeScript/JavaScript and Python.
      56
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes LSP-backed code navigation and editing tools to LLM agents using a single global config file to route file extensions to language servers.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct LSP operation (hover, completion, code actions, diagnostics) or server/lifecycle management. There is no overlap in purpose, and descriptions clearly indicate the specific use case for each tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, with get_* for retrieval and start/restart/open/close/set for actions. The naming convention is uniform throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    9 tools is well-scoped for an LSP server, covering server lifecycle (start/restart/log level), document management (open/close), and core code intelligence operations (hover, completions, actions, diagnostics) without unnecessary redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the primary LSP interactions expected for code analysis and editing workflows, including hover, completions, code actions, and diagnostics. However, it lacks common LSP features such as go-to-definition, formatting, or workspace symbols, which are minor gaps for a general-purpose language server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues