get_release

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full behavioral burden. It only repeats the read nature implied by the name ('Obtiene') and does not disclose any additional traits such as error handling, required auth, or what happens if both tag and release_id are supplied. No value is added beyond the function name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that efficiently conveys the core purpose. There is no fluff or redundancy, and it gets straight to the point. It is appropriately sized for a simple retrieval tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and annotations, the description must compensate by explaining behavior and usage context. It fails to clarify the release identifier options (tag vs release_id), the required context, or return expectations. The tool is under-specified for its complexity (4 params, optional identifiers) and lacks essential guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with individual descriptions for each parameter. The tool description does not mention any parameter semantics or clarify the relationship between tag and release_id. This aligns with the baseline score of 3 for high schema coverage; the description adds nothing beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Obtiene detalles de un release específico' clearly states a specific verb (obtiene) and resource (detalles de un release específico), distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_releases. It precisely indicates this tool fetches details for one release, not a list or creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides zero guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, exclusions, or contrast with list_releases or get_repository. No context is given for choosing between tag and release_id, leaving the usage context entirely to the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.