mcp-github-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-github-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude Code manage GitHub issues, branches, and pull requests through natural language, automating the full development workflow from planning to closing.523 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables GitHub API operations such as managing repositories, issues, and pull requests through natural language.305 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to directly manage GitHub repositories, including PRs, issues, and code search, using natural language.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Claude and other compatible LLMs to interact with the GitHub API, supporting features like creating issues, retrieving repository information, listing issues, and searching repositories.4-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude live access to your GitHub workspace — PR reviews, issue triaging, repo search, and weekly digest reports through natural language.7MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA working MCP server that connects to the real GitHub API, enabling users to manage repositories, issues, pull requests, and more through natural language in Claude Desktop.-
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear separation between search, get, list, create, update, delete, and close operations. Even similar operations like close_issue and update_issue are distinct in purpose and description.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with verbs like list, get, create, update, delete, close, merge, and search. The naming clearly communicates the action and target resource without mixing conventions.
With 39 tools, the server is significantly larger than typical MCP servers. While many GitHub operations are covered, the count exceeds the practical threshold for agent navigation, making it feel bloated and hard to manage.
The tool set covers many GitHub features—repos, issues, PRs, webhooks, releases, tags—but lacks repository creation, file operations, and delete/update for several resources such as issues, releases, and tags, creating dead ends in common workflows.