get_list_stats
Retrieve subscriber statistics for a specific list, including engagement and growth metrics.
Instructions
Get statistics for a subscriber list
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | The list ID |
Retrieve subscriber statistics for a specific list, including engagement and growth metrics.
Get statistics for a subscriber list
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | The list ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states 'get statistics' without specifying the nature of the statistics, read-only nature, authorization requirements, or side effects. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, short sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient, achieving conciseness without sacrificing clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should explain what statistics are returned (e.g., subscriber count, growth rate). It does not, leaving the agent uncertain about the tool's output. Combined with many sibling tools, the lack of detail hinders proper selection.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has one parameter 'list_id' with description 'The list ID', coverage 100%. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate. No further semantic enrichment is provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get statistics for a subscriber list' clearly states the action (get) and the resource (statistics for a subscriber list). It differentiates from siblings like 'get_list_details' and 'get_lists' by focusing on statistical data.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_list_details' or other statistical tools. The description lacks context about appropriate scenarios or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pauliowest/cmon-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server