delete_list
Delete a subscriber list by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Delete a subscriber list
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | The list ID to delete |
Delete a subscriber list by providing its unique ID.
Delete a subscriber list
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | The list ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Delete a subscriber list' without mentioning irreversibility, permission requirements, or side effects like subscriber removal. This leaves the agent without critical safety information.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence that is front-loaded and direct. However, it is overly terse, sacrificing necessary context for future use. It fulfills brevity but at the expense of completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and low parameter complexity, the description should explain the consequences of deletion (e.g., irreversible, cascading to subscribers). It does not, leaving the agent with insufficient context for safe and effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already defines 'list_id' with a description, achieving 100% coverage. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'subscriber list', making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'delete_segment' or 'delete_campaign'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives among the many delete operations. An agent receives no context about when deletion is appropriate or what to consider before invoking.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pauliowest/cmon-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server