patentref-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to patentref-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes 20+ tools that let any MCP-compatible client answer patent-rule questions from MPEP/USC/CFR via hybrid vector, lexical, and reranked search, hunt prior art across 100M+ patents through Google BigQuery, run automated 35 USC 112 compliance and claim-definiteness checks, and generate patent-style diagrams. It also supports a guided idea-to-draft-application workflow covering claims, specification, and formatting review for US and European filing.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes 20+ tools that let users search MPEP/USC/CFR patent rules via hybrid RAG, hunt prior art across 100M+ patents through Google BigQuery, run automated 35 USC 112 compliance checks on claims and applications, and generate patent-style diagrams.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to search patent rules and prior art across MPEP/USC/CFR and BigQuery's 100M+ patent dataset, run automated 35 USC 112 compliance and claim reviews, and generate patent-style diagrams. It exposes 20+ tools for patent drafting, analysis, and diagram generation through any MCP-compatible client.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables access to USPTO patent data through multiple APIs including patent search, prosecution history, PTAB proceedings, and patent litigation. Provides 52 tools across six data sources.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePatent by Ouroboros Apps (https://ouroborosapps.com). USPTO patent search and prior art lookup: search public patent records, fetch a patent, list citations, and run a prior-art search. Not legal advice. USPTO only. Connect by pasting https://patent-mcp.vercel.app/mcp into Claude, Cursor, Grok, or ChatGPT developer mode (OAuth). Docs: https://ouroborosapps.com/docs/patentMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI clients to perform hybrid RAG searches over MPEP/USC/CFR patent regulations and BigQuery searches across 100M+ patents, along with automated claims analysis and diagram generation. It exposes tools for prior art search, 35 USC 112 compliance checks, and patent-style figure creation.-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
The rule-lookup tools (rep_required, fee_schedule, route_windows, pph_routes, ai_use_statement_required, grace_period) each target a clearly different topic, and search_patents vs similar_patents vs search_disclosures are well separated. The main overlaps are get_claim_tree vs get_patent_brief (both return one US patent's claims with offsets/anchors) and the three metadata tools (rules_index, rules_changelog, build_facts), which all expose version/as_of information and could be mispicked.
All names are snake_case and readable, with a clear internal split between verb-prefixed action tools (get_claim_tree, get_patent_brief, check_patent_status, search_patents, search_disclosures, build_facts) and bare-noun rule queries (fee_schedule, grace_period, rep_required). Mixing verb-first and noun-only conventions is a minor deviation but predictable within each group.
15 tools is well within the comfortable range and each maps to a distinct data surface (patent structure, status, search, similarity, office rules, disclosures, dataset metadata). No obvious filler or trivially redundant tool.
Core lifecycle looks covered: search, status verdict with reinstatement basis, claim tree and brief, similarity, plus a rich office-rules surface with sourcing and a changelog. Gaps remain around non-US patent structure (claim tools are US-only), citations/family/applicant lookups, and full description text, but agents can work around these for the stated scope.