Skip to main content
Glama
pat229988
by pat229988

Related Servers

Alternatives to MailOKF MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted, multi-mailbox MCP server that exposes IMAP/SMTP operations as tools for AI agents, enabling email management like listing folders, reading, searching, sending, and moving messages via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that provides LLM clients with read/write access to email and calendar data from Gmail, iCloud, and generic IMAP providers. It runs entirely on your machine, keeping data private while enabling email management, calendar operations, and task handling through natural language.
      39
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A private, single-user MCP server that unifies Gmail, Microsoft 365/Outlook, and IMAP mailboxes for LLMs to search and read emails live, without storing or caching mailbox contents.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives an AI assistant access to IMAP/SMTP mailboxes to read, search, organize, draft, and send email, with local mirroring and full-text search, no third-party data path, and credentials stored only in the macOS Keychain.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server for agents that need to work across multiple Gmail and Microsoft 365 accounts without cloud token storage.
      6
      -

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 38 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most mail_* and email_* tools have clear purposes, but there is notable overlap in the sync tools (mail_sync_initial, mail_sync_now, mail_sync_all) which could confuse an agent choosing which to invoke. The 'okf_' and 'vector_' prefixed tools are also conceptually related to mail syncing/indexing, creating some boundary ambiguity between mail_sync_* and okf_rebuild_bundle/vector_index_update.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: email_* tools use verb_noun (email_add_account, email_get, email_send), but there are inconsistencies like email_add_account vs email_list_accounts (verb prefix on some, noun prefix on others), and mail_* tools use a different prefix entirely (mail_sync_*, mail_attachment_*). The verb placement varies (email_get before email_get_thread, email_send vs email_reply). Also tool names like 'email_add_account' have a noun in the middle rather than a resource at the end.

    Tool Count2/5

    38 tools is well beyond the ideal 3-15 range and leans heavy. While email operations naturally need many actions, the apparent scope includes network/auth (add_account, remove_account, test_account), lifecycle (get/get_thread/delete/batch_delete), organization (move/batch_move/label/folder), drafts/send (send/reply/forward/draft_create), attachments (three mail_attachment_* tools), plus a parallel OKF/vector knowledge system. This feels like 2-3 servers' worth of functionality compressed into one.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface is fairly complete for the email domain: CRUD on accounts, full email lifecycle (get/search/send/reply/forward/delete), batch operations, folders, labels, drafts, and attachments are all covered. There are minor gaps like missing undo/save-draft operations and no unread-count summary, but these are workable. The addition of OKF and vector indexing extends completeness beyond basic email into knowledge management, though it arguably over-scopes the server.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues