bitrix24_task_get
Retrieve complete details of a specific Bitrix24 task using its ID.
Instructions
Get a single Bitrix24 task by ID with full details
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | Task ID |
Retrieve complete details of a specific Bitrix24 task using its ID.
Get a single Bitrix24 task by ID with full details
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | Task ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Only states 'with full details', implying read-only retrieval but lacks specifics on permissions, error handling, or side effects. Insufficient for a read tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose. No extraneous words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one parameter and no output schema; description covers basic retrieval intent but does not elaborate on return structure or edge cases. Adequate for minimal completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (taskId described as 'Task ID' in schema), so description adds no new meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states 'Get a single Bitrix24 task by ID with full details', with specific verb, resource, and scope. Distinguishes from sibling tools like bitrix24_task_list (multiple tasks) and update/mutate tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies use when you have a specific task ID and need full details, but provides no explicit when-not or comparison to alternative tools like bitrix24_task_list. Minimal guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/paskal/bitrix24-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server