bitrix24_crm_contact_get
Retrieve a specific CRM contact by ID. Access detailed contact information from Bitrix24.
Instructions
Get a single CRM contact by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| contactId | Yes | Contact ID |
Retrieve a specific CRM contact by ID. Access detailed contact information from Bitrix24.
Get a single CRM contact by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| contactId | Yes | Contact ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as error handling (e.g., missing ID), authentication requirements, or response structure. The minimal description fails to compensate for the lack of annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded purpose. Appropriate length for a simple retrieval tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and no description of what the response contains. For a 'get' tool, agents need to know the structure of the returned contact object. This omission leaves the tool incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter (contactId) is fully described in the schema with type and pattern. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's own description. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description explicitly states 'Get a single CRM contact by ID', clearly identifying the verb, resource, and filtering criterion. Distinguishes from sibling list tools like bitrix24_crm_contact_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies use when you have a contact ID, but no explicit guidance on when to use this versus alternatives like contact_list or other get tools. No exclusion criteria or prerequisites mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/paskal/bitrix24-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server