Skip to main content
Glama
partymola

monzo-mcp

monzo_search_transactions

Search cached Monzo transactions by merchant, payee, description, or notes. Identifies bank transfers by payee name and auto-syncs when cache is stale.

Instructions

Search cached transactions by merchant, counterparty (payee), description, or notes.

Auto-syncs if the cache is stale (last sync before today).

Case-insensitive partial match across merchant_name, counterparty_name, description, and notes fields. Counterparty matching finds bank transfers (faster payments, p2p, bacs) by payee name.

Returns {"account_type": ..., "transactions": [...]}, where account_type echoes the filter applied and is null when unfiltered.

Args: query: Search term account_type: "personal" or "joint" (default: all) since: Start date, e.g. "2026-01-01" (inclusive) before: End date, e.g. "2026-02-01" (exclusive) limit: Max results (default 30)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
queryYes
sinceNo
beforeNo
account_typeNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.9.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / account_type / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "personal",
      +      "joint"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses case-insensitive partial matching, the exact fields searched, counterparty behavior for bank transfers, cache auto-sync behavior, and the response shape. This is unusually transparent for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, followed by compact, high-value behavioral details and a clean Args list. Every sentence adds information; there is no redundant filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with five parameters and no annotations, the description covers search matching, cache staleness behavior, date-range semantics, account filtering, result limits, and the returned JSON shape. Nothing essential is missing for an agent to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, but the description lists every parameter with meaningful detail: query semantics, account_type values, since/before inclusivity with examples, and the limit default. This fully compensates for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with a specific verb-resource pair: 'Search cached transactions by merchant, counterparty (payee), description, or notes.' This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like monzo_list_transactions or monzo_sync by focusing on search across cached transaction fields.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear usage context: search by named fields, with automatic sync when the cache is stale ('last sync before today'). It stops short of explicitly naming alternatives or saying when not to use the tool, but the intended scenarios are easy to infer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.