monitor_user_disconnect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must carry the full burden. The minimal description does not disclose side effects (e.g., session termination impact), required permissions, or what 'disconnect' entails beyond the basic action. With zero annotations, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with action and object. Highly efficient for an agent processing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description lacks essential context such as when to disconnect (e.g., user session timeout, security threat), that the 'all' option disconnects all sessions (a powerful operation), or any permission requirements. Incomplete for a tool with no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 3 parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema is self-sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action ('Disconnect') and the resource ('authenticated firewall user session'). The verb and object are specific, and the tool is distinguishable from sibling tools like monitor_firewall_session_close or monitor_vpn_ssl_delete_user, which operate on different session types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. With many sibling monitor tools, the description should indicate prerequisites or exclusions (e.g., use for firewall sessions, not for VPN sessions). The current text provides no usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.