firewall_address_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Minimal behavioral disclosure. No mention of authentication needs, pagination, output format, or that it is a read-only operation. Absence of annotations makes this gap significant.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the core action. No wasted words, though it may be too brief for some users.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with an output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it doesn't specify scope (e.g., all VDOMs), ordering, or pagination. Could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so schema already documents both parameters. Description adds no additional semantic value beyond what's in the schema, meeting baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it lists IPv4 firewall address objects, which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like firewall_address_create, firewall_address_get, and firewall_addrgrp_list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like firewall_addrgrp_list or firewall_address_get. Lacks context on filtering, or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.