Skip to main content
Glama
panoskiriakopoulos-sys

Rizerve MCP Server

Get Revenue Report

rizerve_get_revenue_report
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve revenue reports across all properties with breakdowns by day, week, month, or property. Choose time periods from 7 days to 365 days and output as markdown or JSON.

Instructions

Get revenue report across all properties with breakdown by period or property.

Args:

  • period (string): Time period - "7d", "30d", "90d", "365d" (default: "30d")

  • group_by (string): "day", "week", "month", or "property" (default: "month")

  • response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')

Returns: Total revenue with breakdown.

Examples:

  • "How much did we make this month?" → rizerve_get_revenue_report({ period: "30d" })

  • "Revenue by property this year" → rizerve_get_revenue_report({ period: "365d", group_by: "property" })

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
periodNoTime period: "7d", "30d", "90d", "365d", or date range "YYYY-MM-DD/YYYY-MM-DD"30d
group_byNoGroup results by: day, week, month, or propertymonth
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' for human-readable or 'json' for machine-readablemarkdown
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive. Description adds context about aggregation and return value, consistent with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise with clear sections for Args, Returns, Examples. Every sentence adds value, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only report with three optional parameters and no output schema, the description adequately explains return value and usage patterns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so description adds marginal value by reiterating defaults and providing examples; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves a revenue report across all properties with period or property breakdown, distinguishing it from sibling tools like occupancy report or property stats.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides two specific examples with natural language queries mapped to arguments, though it doesn't explicitly state when not to use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/panoskiriakopoulos-sys/rizerve-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server