Skip to main content
Glama
panoskiriakopoulos-sys

Rizerve MCP Server

Delete Rizerve Property

rizerve_delete_property
DestructiveIdempotent

Permanently delete a property and all associated bookings, availability data, and iCal feeds. Use the property's public slug to specify which listing to remove.

Instructions

Delete a property permanently.

⚠️ DESTRUCTIVE: This action cannot be undone. All bookings, availability data, and iCal feeds for this property will also be deleted.

Args:

  • slug (string): Property public slug to delete

  • response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')

Examples:

  • "Remove the old cabin listing" → rizerve_delete_property({ slug: "old-cabin" })

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesProperty public slug (e.g. "beachfront-villa")
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' for human-readable or 'json' for machine-readablemarkdown
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes beyond the annotations by detailing that the deletion is permanent and cascades to bookings, availability, and iCal feeds. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with a clear warning, structured arguments list, and an example. Every sentence is necessary and well-placed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, behavior, parameters, and usage example. No output schema exists, so it is complete for a simple destructive tool without needing to explain return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes both parameters fully (100% coverage). The description adds value by listing them in natural language and providing an example use case, which helps clarify usage beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete a property permanently' with a specific verb and resource, and it explicitly marks the action as destructive, distinguishing it from sibling tools like update or create.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the permanent and cascading effects, helping the agent understand when to use it. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives (e.g., updating instead of deleting) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/panoskiriakopoulos-sys/rizerve-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server