Related Servers

There is significant overlap and unclear boundaries between tools. For example, 'bereken_hypotheek_doorstromer' and 'bereken_hypotheek_uitgebreid' both handle doorstromers with similar outputs and rules, while 'opzet_hypotheek_doorstromer' and 'opzet_hypotheek_uitgebreid' also overlap in functionality. The descriptions indicate that the uitgebreid tools are for advanced cases, but the distinctions are not clearly defined, leading to potential confusion about which tool to use for a given scenario.

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in Dutch, using 'bereken_' or 'haal_' or 'opzet_' as prefixes followed by descriptive nouns (e.g., 'hypotheek_doorstromer', 'actuele_rentes_op'). The naming is uniform across all tools, making it easy to predict and understand the purpose of each tool based on its name.

With 7 tools, the count is reasonable for a mortgage calculation domain, but it feels borderline due to redundancy. The tools cover starters, doorstromers, and advanced cases, but the overlap suggests the set could be consolidated without losing functionality. It's not excessive, but the scope might be slightly over-partitioned.

The tool set covers key mortgage calculation scenarios: starters, doorstromers, interest rates, and advanced setups, with detailed input and output specifications. However, there are minor gaps, such as no explicit tool for updating or deleting calculations, and some tools (e.g., 'bereken_hypotheek_uitgebreid' and 'opzet_hypotheek_uitgebreid') seem to duplicate functionality, which could lead to confusion rather than filling a true gap. Overall, the core workflows are well-covered.