Skip to main content
Glama

List test case executions (full history)

list_test_case_executions

Retrieves the complete execution history for a specific Zephyr test case, including all runs across cycles and ad-hoc runs, sorted newest first. Ideal for analyzing test case flakiness and past results.

Instructions

FULL execution history of ONE test case (Zephyr test case key), newest-first — every run across all cycles plus ad-hoc runs, not just the latest. Each execution includes status, cycle, date, comment, automated flag, timing (execution/estimated ms), who ran it, environment, custom fields, and linked Jira issues. Use this when asked about a specific test case's runs, history, or flakiness. This is TEST-CASE scoped — for the executions of a whole story (Jira issue key) use list_story_executions instead. Read-only; returns an empty list (not an error) when the test case has never been run.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
testCaseKeyYesThe Zephyr test case key, e.g. LOYAL-T45
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it is read-only, returns empty list on no runs, and lists included fields. Lacks mention of pagination or limits but acceptable for a simple tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two well-structured sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no fluff, efficient use of space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, no output schema), the description covers scope, ordering, contents, edge case behavior, and sibling distinction—fully adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers the parameter with description and pattern; description adds minimal extra context beyond reinforcing the key format. With 100% schema coverage, baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it lists the full execution history of one test case, newest-first, clearly distinguishing from the sibling tool list_story_executions which is story-scoped.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use (specific test case's runs, history, flakiness) and when not to use, directing the agent to list_story_executions for story-scoped queries.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pabloveintimilla/zephyr-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server