Skip to main content
Glama
pabloveintimilla

Zephyr Review MCP

by pabloveintimilla
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Zephyr Review MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Zephyr Scale MCP Server

      Milo0821
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Zephyr Scale test management supporting Jira Cloud and Data Center. It enables creating, reading, and managing test cases and test runs via the Atlassian REST API with official API-compliant schemas.
      16
      70 npm
      5
      MIT

    • zephyr-scale-mcp

      vilaabo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing test cases, cycles, and results in Zephyr Scale on self-hosted Jira. Enables AI agents to create, search, update, and delete test artifacts through natural language.
      41
      41 npm
      MIT

    • jira-mcp

      nayzo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Jira Cloud tailored for ALM projects with Zephyr Scale integration, enabling issue management, sprint tracking, and test step operations.
      408 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: project metadata, individual test case details, story-level test listing, story-level execution summary, test-case-level full execution history, comprehensive coverage review, and project-wide search. Descriptions explicitly differentiate between similar-sounding tools (e.g., list_story_test_cases vs review_story_coverage).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (get_project, get_test_case, list_story_executions, list_story_test_cases, list_test_case_executions, review_story_coverage, search_test_cases). The verbs are appropriately varied (get, list, review, search) and clearly indicate the operation type.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a read-only Zephyr review interface. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy, covering project lookup, test case retrieval, story-level test listing, execution history (both story and test-case scoped), full coverage review, and project-wide search.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface fully covers the read-only Zephyr review domain: project metadata, individual test cases (with steps), story-linked tests (lightweight), story executions (pass/fail view), test case execution history (detailed), full coverage bundle (with step quality, cycles, summary), and project-wide search. No obvious gaps for the intended use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources