Skip to main content
Glama
owine

UniFi Protect MCP

by owine

List viewers

protect_list_viewers
Read-only

List UniFi Protect viewers and retrieve their IDs, models, names, states, types, and liveview details. Use limit and offset to page through large sites.

Instructions

List all viewers managed by UniFi Protect. Returns array; each viewer includes: id, modelKey, name, mac, state, type, guid, liveview, streamLimit (7.3.70 docs). On a large site, use limit and offset to page; a paged result also returns totalCount and offset.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoReturn at most this many items
offsetNoSkip this many items first (default 0)

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
offsetNoPaged results only: the index of the first item returned
resultYesArray of items returned by the list endpoint
totalCountNoPaged results only: the number of items in the whole list

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changedv2.15.0
    • addedInput schema / $schema
      Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Return at most this many items",
      +  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +  "minimum": 1,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Skip this many items first (default 0)",
      +  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +  "minimum": 0,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -falseNew value: +{}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / offset
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Paged results only: the index of the first item returned",
      +  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +  "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / totalCount
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Paged results only: the number of items in the whole list",
      +  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +  "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv2.13.0
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / guid
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Hardware MODEL GUID, shared by every unit of the same model. NOT a per-device identifier — use `id` to identify a device.",
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / type
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Hardware model name, e.g. \"UVC G6 Turret\", \"UP Chime PoE\", \"UNVR-PRO\"",
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
  3. Changed10 schema fields changedv2.11.5
    • removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / liveview / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / liveview / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / mac / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / mac / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / modelKey / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / modelKey / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / name / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / name / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / state / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / state / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  4. Addedv2.10.0
  5. Removedv2.9.0
  6. Changed2 schema fields changedv2.7.5
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / liveview
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Assigned live view ID, or null"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / streamLimit
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Max concurrent streams (number)"
      +}
  7. First observedv2.7.4

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=false), so the bar is lower, and the description adds genuine behavioral context: paged responses also return totalCount and offset. The enumerated return fields are largely redundant with the existing output schema, which slightly dilutes the added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose, then return shape, then paging advice in a logical order with no filler sentences. The long field enumeration is the one part that costs more space than it earns, since an output schema already exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description need not explain return values, yet it still covers purpose and pagination behavior adequately. Nothing critical for calling a ReadOnly list endpoint is missing, though an explicit pointer to protect_get_viewer for single-item lookups would make it fully self-routing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the schema already defines limit and offset individually. The description adds meaning by framing both parameters as a coordinated paging mechanism and disclosing the paged-response fields (totalCount, offset), which the schema does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ("List all viewers managed by UniFi Protect") and scopes it as the collection-level operation, which implicitly separates it from the sibling protect_get_viewer. It never names the single-viewer alternative explicitly, so it stops short of full sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives one concrete usage cue — "On a large site, use limit and offset to page" — which tells the agent when paging matters. However, there is no guidance on when to use this list tool rather than protect_get_viewer for an individual viewer, or on any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.