UniFi Protect MCP

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

List bridges

protect_list_bridges

Read-only

Retrieve all UniFi Protect bridges with details like ID, name, MAC, state, and connected clients. Supports pagination via limit and offset for large sites.

Instructions

List all bridges managed by UniFi Protect. Returns array; each bridge includes: id, modelKey, name, mac, state, type, guid, platform, clients (array of MACs), maxClients (7.3.70 docs). On a large site, use limit and offset to page; a paged result also returns totalCount and offset.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`limit`	No	Return at most this many items
`offset`	No	Skip this many items first (default 0)

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`offset`	No	Paged results only: the index of the first item returned
`result`	Yes	Array of items returned by the list endpoint
`totalCount`	No	Paged results only: the number of items in the whole list

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed6 schema fields changedv2.15.0Oct 14, 2026

addedInput schema / $schema

Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

addedInput schema / properties / limit

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Return at most this many items",
+  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+  "minimum": 1,
+  "type": "integer"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / offset

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Skip this many items first (default 0)",
+  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+  "minimum": 0,
+  "type": "integer"
+}

changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
```
Previous value: -falseNew value: +{}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / offset

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Paged results only: the index of the first item returned",
+  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+  "minimum": -9007199254740991,
+  "type": "integer"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / totalCount

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Paged results only: the number of items in the whole list",
+  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+  "minimum": -9007199254740991,
+  "type": "integer"
+}

Changed2 schema fields changedv2.13.0Sep 20, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / guid

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Hardware MODEL GUID, shared by every unit of the same model. NOT a per-device identifier — use `id` to identify a device.",
+  "type": [
+    "string",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / type

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Hardware model name, e.g. \"UVC G6 Turret\", \"UP Chime PoE\", \"UNVR-PRO\"",
+  "type": [
+    "string",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}

Changed10 schema fields changedv2.11.5Sep 13, 2026
- removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / mac / anyOf
```
Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / mac / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / modelKey / anyOf
```
Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / modelKey / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / name / anyOf
```
Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / name / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / platform / anyOf
```
Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / platform / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / state / anyOf
```
Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / state / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

Changed3 schema fields changedv2.7.5Jun 21, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / clients

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Connected client MACs (array of strings)"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / maxClients
```
Added value: +{
+  "description": "Max client capacity (number)"
+}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / result / items / properties / platform

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Hardware platform, e.g. \"mt7621\""
+}

First observedv2.7.4Jun 11, 2026

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description still adds real behavioral context beyond that: the return is an array, and a paged result additionally carries totalCount and offset. It does not cover rate limits or auth requirements, but for a read-only list tool this is solid.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, followed by return shape and then paging advice, so the structure is sound. The full enumeration of every returned field is somewhat long given that an output schema exists and already carries that information, which is the only real inefficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only collection tool, the description, annotations, complete parameter schema and existing output schema together leave no critical gap: the agent knows what it lists, that it is safe, and how to page. Listing return fields is redundant with the output schema rather than filling a hole, so it does not reach a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both limit and offset are already fully documented in the schema. The description adds a modest amount of meaning by explaining when paging is warranted ('on a large site') and what a paged result includes, but this is incremental rather than compensating for a gap, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('List all bridges managed by UniFi Protect'), and the word 'all' signals the unfiltered, collection-level scope that separates it from the sibling protect_get_bridge. It does not explicitly name that sibling, so it falls just short of the top score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives conditional guidance for the parameters ('On a large site, use limit and offset to page'), which is useful, but says nothing about when to prefer this tool over protect_get_bridge or the subscription tools, and offers no exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.